Platform

Optional hosted model routing, without giving up bring-your-own-keys

Updated 2 min read

SeaShell Cloud includes an optional model router: a hosted service for model routing, provider policy, credit checks, rate limits, and usage events. It sits behind an SeaShell runtime feature flag, so bring-your-own-keys stays the default and you opt in only when a team wants centrally managed routing instead of per-developer provider keys.

Why a hosted router at all

Bring-your-own-keys is ideal for individuals, but teams often want one place to set provider policy, enforce rate limits, and account for spend. The model router is that place, offered as an opt-in service rather than a requirement.

With hosted routing, an organization can decide which providers and models are allowed, apply credit checks before a run, and collect usage events for reporting, without distributing raw provider keys to every seat. Developers still work in the same terminal agent; only the routing decision moves.

Still your choice, per run

The router is gated behind an SeaShell runtime feature flag. Nothing about your existing local setup changes unless you turn it on, and you can keep routing directly to your own keys or local Ollama models.

That means the privacy story is intact: local and BYO-key routing remain first-class. Hosted routing is an added option for teams that value central control and reporting, not a toll you must pay to use SeaShell.

Usage without exposing content

The router records usage events (which model, how much) for credit and rate-limit decisions. It is part of the control plane, which is designed not to require prompts, model outputs, or provider request bodies for ordinary operations.

So a team can meter and cap usage while the substance of each request, your code and prompts, stays out of the accounting path. You get spend visibility and policy enforcement without turning the router into a content log.

Frequently asked questions

Does hosted routing replace bring-your-own-keys?
No. Bring-your-own-keys and local models are the default. Hosted routing is opt-in behind a runtime feature flag for teams that want centralized provider policy and usage control.
What does the model router manage?
Model routing, provider policy, credit checks, rate limits, and usage events, so teams can standardize and meter model access.
Does the router see my prompts or code?
The router is part of the control plane, which is designed not to require prompts, model outputs, or provider request bodies for ordinary operations. It records usage events, not content.
How do I turn it on?
Hosted routing is gated behind an SeaShell runtime feature flag, so it is off until you explicitly enable it.

Try SeaShell in your terminal

The terminal-native AI coding agent. Free core, single binary.

Install SeaShell

Related guides

Atlas for Erlang in 2026

Atlas is a terminal-native AI coding agent for Erlang/OTP in 2026. Run it in an app with a rebar.config, map supervisors and gen_server modules, review every diff.

Atlas vs CodeGPT: Terminal AI Coding Agents in 2026

Atlas and CodeGPT comparison for 2026. Atlas offers a terminal-native TUI and permission-gated tool calls. CodeGPT provides a Knowledge Graph and individual file approval workflow.

Atlas with Mistral Medium 3.1 (2508) in 2026

Explore Atlas with Mistral Medium 3.1 (2508), offering a 262,144 token context window and efficient pricing for large-scale coding tasks in 2026.

Atlas with Llama 3.2 1B (local via Ollama) in 2026

In 2026, drive Atlas's background tasks with Llama 3.2 1B (local via Ollama). This 1.3GB model offers a 128,000 token window and free self-hosted operation for offline housekeeping.

Atlas with Command R7B in 2026

Explore Atlas with Cohere's Command R7B, a cost-effective model for coding tasks in 2026. Leverage its 128,000 token context window for efficient code indexing and planning.

Atlas with GPT-5.1 Codex in 2026

Drive Atlas with GPT-5.1 Codex in 2026. This OpenAI model offers 400K context for long-horizon coding at $1.25/Mtok input, $10/Mtok output, balancing cost and capability.

Atlas vs Sourcegraph Cody: Terminal AI Coding Agents in 2026

Comparing Atlas and Sourcegraph Cody in 2026. Atlas offers a terminal-native TUI with permission-gated tool calls and local embeddings. Sourcegraph Cody excels in large enterprise monorepos with cross-repo search via

Atlas with Mistral Medium 3.5 in 2026

Explore Atlas with Mistral Medium 3.5, Mistral's 2026 flagship model. Ideal for EU-hosted development, offering strong reasoning and a 262K token context window.

Browse this resource hub